Torgerson DJ, Roland M (1998).
"A Historical View of Statistical Concepts in Psychology and Educational Research".
Bradshaw CP, Zmuda JH, Kellam SG, Ialongo NS (2009).
Pildal J, Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC (2005).
55 In pragmatic RCTs, although the participants and providers are often unblinded, it is "still desirable and often possible to blind the assessor or obtain an objective source of data for evaluation of outcomes." 35 Analysis of data edit The types of statistical methods used.38 The major disadvantage of permuted-block randomization is that even if the block sizes are large and randomly varied, the procedure can lead to selection bias.Song Zhang; Jing Cao; Ahn,."Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care".20 (3 Suppl 2135."Researchers Show Parachutes Don't Work, But There's A Catch".81 Sales of the drugs then decreased.Steve Melia 98 took issue with these conclusions, arguing that claims about the advantages of RCTs, in establishing causality and avoiding bias, have been exaggerated.
"In medicine, evidence can be confusing - deluged with studies, doctors try to sort out what works, what doesn't".
"Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction.
Successful randomized trials: a handbook for the 21st century.Although the principle of clinical equipoise genuine uncertainty within the expert medical community.Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, Goodman ZD, Koury K, Ling M, Albrecht JK (2001).The New England Journal of Medicine.Can Med Assoc.Journal of Educational Psychology.49 Blinding edit An RCT may be blinded, (also called "masked by "procedures that prevent study participants, caregivers, or outcome assessors from knowing which intervention was received." 48 Unlike allocation concealment, blinding is sometimes fou de concours bon de reduction inappropriate or impossible to perform in an RCT; for example,.The 29 meta-analyses included 11 from general medicine journals; 15 from specialty medicine journals, and 3 from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.